The courses were both difficult and intriguing. My writing for the engineering experience class were challenging, but I liked doing the assignments since they were engaging, such as the product review module, lab report analysis module, technical description, formal letter of introduction, self-reflection memos, and group proposal. In my own experience on the course, I struggled a lot to come up with the correct strategy for the assignment.
I didn’t believe it would be difficult for me before I signed up for the class, but after attending, I recognized I needed to improve my writing technique. My work was disorganized and included grammatical problems due to its poor quality. There is some positive news: I were able to enhance my abilities during the semester by completing all of the homework. Since then, I’ve been able to spot where I’m making errors, such as illogical sentences, punctuation, and grammar, as well as failing to follow the directions or prior criteria for how the essay should be written. This course tremendously benefited me in improving and enhancing my writing style in several ways. This interaction is related to particular course learning goals in the sense that it assists me in producing the finest writing to receive a high mark.
The formal letter of introduction assists me in strengthening the substance of my writing and enhancing the effectiveness of my writing through unity, coherence, and accuracy through and in my writing, I may be more creative in developing and articulating a stance. I was struggling to figure out my future aim, the point of taking a writing engineering class, and my life ambition. After submitting my formal letter of introduction, I received feedback on where I went wrong. Then I changed my writing substance and corrected my grammatical errors to make the text simpler to understand and identified the difficulty with verbs, pronouns, and incomplete comparisons, but I fixed his customary error by going towards the writing center, where they had to address the problem.
The product reviews essay helped me in being more structured in my writing for each section and encouraged me to be more detailed with my writing substance, such as avoiding superfluous words, unfinished sentences, and writing structure with distinctions. I was struggling to figure out how the school bag’s many parts worked and what materials the product was made of. This increased my capacity to progress by creating analyses that were specific and well-constructed in articles..There were mistakes in my writing, such as explanations that were not clear enough and analysis in my essay, so I changed the writing language, which helped my text to be more detailed with each element, which helped my thought to be more understandable. Writing has developed as a result of my experience learning new vocabulary words from the different researcher websites. It helped me in my essay to participate in genre analysis and sensory composition to study effective writing across disciplines and beyond by looking at the writing material when I finished the product writing an essay one month ago.
The leader presentation helped me improve my speaking abilities, which is a widely extensive experience skill that allows me to convey my information effectively. This was the most challenging exercise, but it helped me in a lot of ways because I already learned how to construct a concise sentence for this task and how to talk clearly while being aware of the audience. After receiving criticism from classmates about my presentation, I realized it was too wordy, so I changed it by using common words that are easier to say without stumbling over. The term is important to the course learning outcomes since it develops and engages in the collaborative and social parts of writing processes based on my communication.
The lab report analysis essay enabled me to develop my researching, composing, summarizing, and editing abilities. This stage was a lot of struggle in my experience as a growth because looking at several websites and finding the ideal one with experimentation were difficult portions. Furthermore, a more in-depth assessment of each portion based on the experiment was a challenging component, as was coming up with comments based on good and negative input about lab researchers, for example, the essay was obvious or was logical superfluous. After discovering that my statement of analysis is illogical and that I lack data to back up my analytical assertions concerning the form and language used in my lab reports. So I made my statement more informative and related to my analytical change word fixed my punctuation so that the reader is not confused about my content after reading.
The technical explanation assisted me in focusing more on specifics, as well as improving my abilities and putting things together. The encounter I had difficulty locating the appropriate page for each element was incredibly controversial since on a website, every single item was not included. I identified a fault in my writing in which my sentence construction continues to contain weaknesses that inhibit reader comprehension. So I decided to adjust my sentence construction and go to the writing center to improve my construction, such as utilizing a suitable tone so that my essay does not appear sloppy. The specific mistake assists me in the future in the execution of modifications in my writing.
The self-reflection memos helped me in identifying the inaccuracy in my context through writing. I was either not adopting the right terminology in my writing or I was being extremely thorough. After receiving feedback on the memo, I changed my vocabulary to make my writing appear more innovative has been associated with course learning outcomes because it enhances my recognition of myself and pulls on those funds to develop a grammatical sense, helping me to see where I was making mistakes and how to correct them more successfully.
The collaborative project helped in improving my creative process, as well as my opportunity to share the ability to converse consistently with team members. The difficulties I had in developing my abilities to be creative in writing with technical development and thought when constructing the introduction so that the audience could easily grasp. We reviewed the materials as a group, but they found a mistake on that page, where every word was in the past tense, and the bulk of the work was difficult to understand. So I modified the phrasing in my writing and made everything present tense to make it easier to interpret. In this collaboration, I was able to establish and participate in group and interpersonal parts of text production, as well as improve skills for authoring, rewriting, proofreading, including conscience.
Kevin Villon’s presentation enables me to concentrate on your thesis statement on what my people need to know while also providing a clear idea of how to put a slide together in a way that appears to be obvious logic. I improved my drafting and receiving strategies. In my initial draft of my leadership presentation, I had a lot of trouble understanding the concept of how to see the idea. After watching Kevin’s presentation, I realized that confidence is essential. I changed my presentation’s explanation section so that it appeared the concept is arranged to make the wording more comprehensible. I also learned how to reconcile your own writing goals and audience expectations while reading rhetorical norms in a rhetorical context. I practiced utilizing it since my impression was that one report was better presented than the other two. It encouraged me to focus on your comparative language and additional information to completely convey to my readers exactly.
Self-reflection best practices Edwin Negarate Ramous. It taught me that focusing on overall progress as a writer and the influence on your audience is something I need to improve about my writing style. I need to strengthen my writing process on the topic since I tend to focus on off-topic phrases and use a bunch of words in my perspective section. One sentence or at best two sentences is sufficient, but I created a complete paragraph. I was having difficulty writing the words in a coherent style and putting in less information After seeing Edwin’s discussion board, I realized that just throwing words at an audience should not be the key; the ideal approach is to deliver development in a way that influences the audience’s understanding and notion. Then I tweaked the overall strategy to make it appear more important to the target demographic. I enhanced my ability to design and participate in the collaborative and social components of writing processes.
Tech comm-Emphasizing important information. This section assisted me in improving my ability to be clear with a phrase without being repeated, which benefits the word to make it a smooth and brief essay to comprehend. I need to enhance my sentences because I need to focus on my sentence structure when I write since my thoughts don’t always make sense after reading the article, it helped me to put my phrases in a correct tone, as I usually have something lacking in my writing, such as an item or a place. After reading this article, I returned to my whole essay to improve my sentence structure and writing style. It strengthened my ability to construct and convey a position through writing
We can see that this course was not easy to pass; the best way to pass is to work hard and build yourself up, but this course was also valuable and helpful if you are not good at writing. Since this class taught me a lot about writing content and technique, I realized there are many ways to improve my writing. The course encourages and motivates me when I am looking at a poor grade because earning a good grade doesn’t matter since getting a bad grade helps you to work hard and attain that excellent grade. Overall, these programs serve me in a variety of ways and help me develop my writing abilities. I recommend that anyone who is having trouble writing take Ms. Crystal Rodwall’s class because she is an excellent professor in the program.
